September 14th, 2009
Additional changes in underwriting guidelines apply to a borrower’s tax returns. As a result of “ongoing concern with fraud and misrepresentations” Fannie Mae is making new requirements concerning lenders obtaining transcripts of a borrower’s tax returns. The new guideline will require the lender to obtain written permission from the borrower, both at application and closing, to obtain the borrower’s tax transcripts to verify income documentation provided by the borrower with their loan application.
Verification of employment guidelines are also being made. Previously a lender, if underwriting a loan that has received an approve/eligible through DU, was required to obtain a verbal Verification of Employment (VOE) within 30 days of the closing date. Since many large corporations have complex and cumbersome Human Resource systems that can take up to 3 weeks to respond to a request for verification of employment, the new guidelines are going to present some serious issues since they require the VOE to be obtained by the lender not more than 10 days prior to closing.
Whether a borrower is applying for his/her first mortgage or fifth, the tightening of underwriting guidelines across the board are making lending more difficult. Borrowers with superior credit rating are not given any ‘exemptions’ from these underwriting guidelines. As the holidays approach and fears of recession continuing well into 2010, borrowers are left wondering if getting a new mortgage is even possible.
There have been numerous cases recently in my own experience where highly qualified borrowers were denied financing based on unreasonable guidelines or a lack of ‘common sense’ underwriting. When borrowers with superior credit and significant assets can not get financing due to lack of a common sense approach to underwriting then it’s safe to say those less qualified are doomed. If borrower’s from all walks of life are unable to buy homes, the economic recovery that everyone is desparately seeking will be a long time in coming.
Posted in Uncategorized, Residential Mortgages, Consumer Alerts, General Commentary, Regulation | No Comments »
September 13th, 2009
Fannie Mae, which purchases a great majority of the conventional home mortgages currently underwritten in the US, made recent changes in their qualifying guidelines which are the result of “a comprehensive review of current underwriting and eligibility policies with a specific focus on current market conditions.” These include “increased unemployment, stock market fluctuations, and heightened concern about fraud in the mortgage lending process,” in the policy announcement 9-19 from Fannie Mae’s selling guide.
The maximum age of credit documents is reduced for both existing construction and new construction, 30 days reduction for existing (120 to 90) and 60 days reduction for new construction (180 to 120).
Additionally, Fannie is making dramatic changes in its guidelines for construction financing, especially construction-to-permanent loan programs. Fannie’s announcement claims this is due to fears of change in a borrower’s financial circumstances during the construction period when utilizing a single-closing loan program. The most significant change is the lower LTV (loan-to-value) requirements. Now, if upon the completion of construction, the borrower’s total loan-to-value is not 70% or less, the borrower will be required to go through underwriting and closing a second time. This change alone can cost the borrower thousands in additional closing expenses.
Lending in the US is already limited to those able to provide extensive documentation as to their income, assets and credit history. The harder it is for qualified, A+ credit customers to get financing, the longer the economic recovery will take.
Next, additional changes from Fannie Mae.
Posted in Residential Mortgages, Consumer Alerts, General Commentary, Regulation | No Comments »
September 8th, 2009
Washington Post’s September 7 article “Mortgage Market Bound by Major US Role” by writers, Zackary A. Godfarb and Dina ElBoghdady is an excellent overview of the events and circumstances that led to the mortgage meltdown. In addition, it gives the average individual a better understanding of exactly what is at stake as a result of the government’s intervention in salvaging lenders that were on the verge of bankruptcy.
Bottom line, all the bad loans that created this situation are still there, the difference now is taxpayers are now ‘on the hook’ instead of private banks and lending institutions. The numbers are staggering and the risky loans are still there, they are just backed by the government now.
When the next wave of foreclosures starts late this year and into early 2010, U.S. taxpayers will ultimately pay the price of the bailout. What this will mean to an economy already struggling to just to stabilize is anyone’s guess, but it probably won’t be positive.
Posted in Mortgage Process, Residential Mortgages, General Commentary, Regulation | No Comments »
September 1st, 2009
On July 30, the new Truth-in-Lending (TIL) guidelines went into effect drastically changing the processing of mortgages in this country. While it has been law for some time that borrowers must receive a Good Faith Estimate and Truth-in-Lending disclosure within 3 days of applying for a new mortgage, the new guidelines require that borrowers receive a new TIL if the APR changes more than .125% during the course of processing the loan. Re-disclosure requires the borrower to wait at least 7 business days before s/he can close. (Business days being defined as Monday-Saturday not including any Federal holidays.)
While proponents of the legislation say this protects the borrower from a ‘closing ambush’, it is also detrimental to a borrower that has a closing deadline. In the current market, many real estate transactions, because of low prices, high inventory and, often desperate sellers, contracts are written with very tight time frames. In addition, for first-time buyers taking advantage of the tax credit (which expires on 12/1/09) and are pressed to close by 11/30/09, the re-disclosure and 7-day waiting period may cause a lot of heartburn.
The idea is for regulations to protect consumers but consumer protection does not have to include cumbersome and unnecessary processing issues. Few, if any of the consumers I’ve worked with over the many years I’ve been in this business, know or understand what the APR on their mortgage is. They want to know two things—their interest rate and their monthly payment. In some cases, a more experienced borrower will also want to know the points being paid to the lender or broker.
A borrower most certainly should want to know and understand what all these terms and fees mean to their final mortgage costs and closing, but a 7-day waiting period, which could cause a borrower many logistical difficulties when moving, etc. is part of the transaction, may provide no real benefit to the consumer.
In addition to the logistical challenges, many times the borrower’s APR changes as a result of getting a lower interest rate or a reduction in points being paid than what was initially quoted at the time of application. The new regulations require the re-disclosure and 7-day waiting period even if the change is to the borrower’s benefit.
There are a number of ways to ensure appropriate re-disclosure to borrowers is made timely if interest rate or other changes affect the cost of the loan (APR). Imposing a 7-day waiting period, however, may ultimately cost the borrower on many levels if it prevents a timely closing
Posted in Mortgage Process, General Commentary, Regulation | No Comments »
August 29th, 2009
Bank delinquency rates have gone up every quarter this year and are currently higher than they have been they began collecting data over 20 years ago. When individuals as well as businesses begin to struggle to make their payments timely, another wave of economic backlash usually soon follows. Some things may give the appearance of improved economic conditions but it may also be the illusion of a little calm before the next storm.
As unemployment continues to increase, prices for goods and services climb higher and companies already suffering begin further tightening of their proverbial belts by holding off on merit or cost of living increases, consumers find they have to resort to credit for basics like food and gasoline. When conditions don’t improve, the delinquencies on those credit charges begin to mount. Another wave of foreclosures are already predicted in the coming months so we do we begin to actually ‘turn the tide’ on this recession?
For any consumer reading this, please be proactive with your credit and don’t get delinquent. Make minimum payments if you have to but make them on time to protect your credit rating. It’s better to have some credit build up than to have your credit history ruined. If you are already delinquent, call your creditor and ask for a payment modification, even if it’s temporary, to help restore a good payment history. Unnecessary late charges, even if late payments aren’t reported on your credit history, just cost you more money. Pay timely and avoid the extra 5 to 20 percent late fee companies charge. If left with little other alternative when money is tight consider a part-time job to help cover expenses. Many ‘work at home’ jobs are available now for those that would have child-care issues.
The tide will eventually turn and economic conditions will improve. You’ll get a raise, a better job, costs of goods and services will go down and life will feel a little less frantic. Protect yourself, your family and your credit by avoiding delinquency and you’ll weather the storm well!
Posted in Residential Mortgages, Consumer Alerts, General Commentary | No Comments »
August 28th, 2009
With the administration’s pressure to stop the increasing numbers of foreclosures nationwide, Citigroup has hired around 1400 new employees. In addition to the personnel, Citi has spent time and money improving infrastructure, such as more telephone lines, in order to accommodate the ever increasing number of calls from distressed borrowers.
While commendable on the surface, keep in mind that Citi received approximately $45 billion in TARP funds last year to avoid collapse as a result of their high numbers of subprime loans and other tainted investments. In addition to being a lending giant, Citi is also a servicer of mortgage loans for other lenders. Estimates put Citi handling around $770 billion in mortgage loans of which the lion’s share are for other lenders. Citi is the fourth-largest US mortgage servicer.
Posted in Residential Mortgages, General Commentary | No Comments »
August 27th, 2009
The Associated Press reported Monday afternoon that Attorney Generals located in Washington state, Iowa, Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Nevada, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Missouri and Ohio are forming a task force to investigate mortgage fraud along with representatives of the Department of Justice, Federal Tresury, Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the Federal Trade Commission.
This is a significant first step to arresting practices detrimental to the industry as a whole such as equity skimming, false foreclosure rescue offers, straw purchase deals and unethical and/or predatory lending practices.
We will keep you aprised of developments surrounding this effort to correct and curtail wrongdoing in the mortgage industry.
Posted in Mortgage Process, Consumer Alerts, Regulation | No Comments »
August 26th, 2009
In a previous post, I described some of the issues consumers are facing regarding loan modifications. Recently, an Arizona judge ordered Wells Fargo to ‘explain’ their modification practices before the court. To read all about it, visit Mandelman Matters.
Posted in Residential Mortgages, General Commentary | No Comments »
August 24th, 2009
On May 1st this year, the Federal Housing Finance Agency implemented the Home Valuation Code of Conduct (HVCC) as a result of a lawsuit filed by New York’s Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, against former lending giant Washington Mutual. While the initial aim of this legislation was to attempt to protect consumers, the result has hurt more than it’s helped.
Prior to May 1st, lenders had the ability to select the appraiser for a particular property based on the appraiser’s good credentials, knowledge of the market area and the fee s/he would charge the borrower. The lender could agree to cover the cost of the appraisal for the customer as part of their service to the customer. The turnaround time for a typical appraisal was 3-4 days and, if the appraisal order was placed with an appraiser that could not meet the turn-time request, the order could be withdrawn and placed with another qualified appraiser. Most importantly, if the borrower was seeking a refinance, the lender could call the appraiser to discuss the possible value of the property prior to placing the order and, in doing so, could help the borrower avoid the expense of an appraisal if the value would not support the new loan requested.
Now, as a result of the new regulations, a lender can have no involvement in the placement of appraisal orders. They are required to be placed through a third-party. The lender doesn’t get to select the appraiser based on his/her knowledge and experience. The appraisal is ‘assigned’ to an appraiser by the third-party which charges a fee for the ‘placement’ of the appraisal and then ‘assigns’ that appraisal order to whomever they choose. This frequently results in appraisers being sent to do appraisal in areas they are not familiar with, fees to the borrower that are substantially higher often as much as $200 or more, and much longer turn around times which can put a borrower’s contract in jeapordy if it is a purchase with a set timeframe to close.
With a refinance, being unable to speak to the appraiser prior to placing the order to get any idea of value means the borrower must spend $450 or more for an appraisal that may or may not support the loan s/he is requesting. The borrower, often considering refinancing as a means to alleviate some other financial challenge, would have then spent a considerable amount of money for no benefit if his/her property did not appraise.
While I don’t dispute there were unethical practices by many lenders and appraisers alike which have contributed to the housing/mortgage crisis, a more reasonable response to this issue would be to pass legislation that would prevent the inheirent ‘conflict of interest’ that arises when a mortgage lender or broker also owns a realty firm, a title agency and an appraisal company. These kinds of incestuous relationships, which still exist, but were even more prevelant during the housing boom as one company and/or individual tried to control and financially benefit from all parts of a real estate and mortgage transaction. This led to many abuses. Again, the simpler correction would be to make it unlawful for the same company and/or individual to have ownership in more than one ’servicer’ to an individual residential real estate transaction.
Posted in Residential Mortgages, Consumer Alerts, General Commentary, Regulation | No Comments »
August 23rd, 2009
If you are having trouble getting your current mortgage modified, it may have more to do with the lender’s desire to collect the very high fees they charge for delinquent loans than on the lender’s limited staff capabilities as the Federal government has alluded to. The Tresury department has expressed that mortgage companies are not hiring people quickly enough to meet the current volume of customers seeking modification. I have had numerous customers share with me their frustations and difficulties in trying to get someone at their lender and/or servicing company to assist them with answering questions, let alone getting their loan modified. In the meantime, delinquency fees continue to accrue on their loans putting them further behind.
Another issue is those who are pro-active and are trying to avoid becoming delinquent due to job loss, death of a spouse or divorce, are often told that they must become delinquent before any modification option is available to them. One late mortgage payment can drop an individual’s credit score up to 100 points. Since credit scoring drives many factors in an individual’s life beyond the issuing of credit, such as employment opportunities or rates offered on insurance, it is ridiculous that lenders want to ‘recommend’ to individuals to become 90-days delinquent on their mortgage before seeking modification assistance. Yet that is exactly what has been told to several people I know who later called me seeking some kind of solution to their situation. Unfortunately, loan modification can only be offered by an individual’s current mortgage company. In most cases, due to depressed values, refinancing with a new lender is not an option because the property will not appraise for what is currently owed on the mortgage, further strapping the homeowner.
If a person is in a financial crisis to begin with and is attempting to find a workable solution before the crisis becomes dire, they should be applauded and given every possible resource available. To tell someone that essentially, they will not be offered any help until they’ve allowed their credit rating to be destroyed does not make sense in any way. Oh, and by the way, even after giving a borrower this ‘advice’ to let their mortgage go 90 days delinquent doesn’t guarantee the lender will agree to a modification at that time.
Posted in Residential Mortgages, Consumer Alerts, General Commentary | No Comments »